Should camera makers continue to drive megapixel counts upward at the expense of other features?

  .

We know it isn’t a straight-up this-or-that argument. Camera makers have a complicated set of decisions to make but generally we’d like you to think in these terms for this argument:

  .

If you could have a camera that was an improvement over your current camera in only one of the following ways, which camera would you prefer:

  .

Camera A - Only more megapixels: (50%-100% more), all other features stay the same or degrade normally (noise, fps, etc).
Camera B - Better Image Quality: Same megapixel count and a noticeable (25%-50%) increase in dynamic range, color fidelity (e.g. reds), noise performance, FPS, etc.

I Want Camera A (more MP) Because:

I Want Camera B (better IQ) Because:

Add the first point to this side

Once there are a handful of arguments on either side, other people will be more likely to contribute.

Argue “I Want Camera A (more MP) Because:”

Is an argument missing?

Please contribute - sign in and add the argument yourself.

Is an argument inaccurate, incorrect or has it been debunked?

Please contribute a counter-argument that gives a reasonable response to the argument with a web address to a reference for further reading.

Does the text of an argument misrepresent it in a biased or inaccurate way?

Please tweet @stef on Twitter to start a conversation about how to fix it.

Embed this debate

Mash this debate

Get this debate as JSON(P)